Breaking News: Miercurea Ciuc, Romania
The epicenter of Szekelyland appears to have entered into a loose Transylvania alliance with Cluj to defeat the scourge of Denmark by extending its considerable forces throughout the land. Romer!can has obtained rights to an exclusive photograph which surfaced as proof of the action.
Officials and experts in Braşov are currently assessing facts and analyzing the impact this unexpected campaign will have on the Romanian landscape. Initial reports indicate the offensive is limited in scope, but may alter life as we know it.
Stay tuned for further updates as details are uncovered.

Update: According to extensive personal research since 2003, it’s seemed like Tuborg Strong has been the beer of choice among income-earning, urban-dwelling Romanians not drinking at home. There is some anecdotal evidence that Carlsberg has managed to shove enough advertising down the throats of Bucureşti that residents in that specific city might actually believe it is “possibly the best lager in the world.”
Oh, the Force is strong with that marketing budget.
Basically, when one is out with friends who like beer and have a job, the party tends to revolve around Tuborg Strong more often than not. As a result, it’s fairly unusual to find a hip place in Romania which does not offer Tuborg Strong on the menu.
This trend may be explained in part by the stereotype that club-going Romanians spend more to avoid drinking cheap beer in public to impress their friends, which certainly sounds plausible since much of the rest of the world shares this phenomenon of underbudgeted pretenders living well beyond their means for one night a week in order to front to prospective bedmates at the local bar.
I like to think the answer is a little more basic than that. The fact is that Tuborg Strong has a higher alcohol content. One bottle of 7% strong beer can often impact people to nearly the same degree as two regular beers. That alone is attractive to some drinkers.
Since that seems to be true, you can next factor in the relative cost benefit. Essentially, most folks get more inebriation per leu with a higher alcohol content brew like Turborg’s Royal Export.
The last reason is taste, a highly subjective matter directly relative to one’s beer sampling experiences and personal preference. In this part of the world, the sour mash malt taste is a desirable contrast against the sea of milquetoast brews sold everywhere, the occasionally sickly sweet blondes, and the rancid products of Turgu Mureş. Tuborg Strong is one of the better tasting beers.
The market for such beer has essentially been owned Tuborg Strong. In addition, Tuborg has it’s regular “Gold” beer, a bland run-of-the-mill drink, and the seasonal Christmas Brew, a stronger beer with an excellent flavor comprised of maltiness, balanced spices, and perhaps a little nutty undertone.
It seems the international companies who acquired all the previously Romanian-owned brands have gotten more aggressive about promoting those brands to the the people living in the very country from which the brands originated. I mean, why invest in buying out almost every single brewery in Romania and kill each brand?
Seems much smarter to crank up the production rates and rake in a very healthy profit selling beer under a local name to consumers who have no idea the profits are leaving the country. Very clever, if you ask me.
And that’s what’s been happening. The folks formerly from Cluj started to promote Stejar 7% Strong Beer, with its’ sour malt taste I first found available for sale in late 2005. At roughly half the price of its’ target competitor, Stejar has gone from unique curiosity to a regular staple product at many stores in Braşov, where it now outsells Tuborg Strong by a very large margin at some places. I understand they’ve started to promote it on television these days, which is a sure sign of brand commitment.
I’d count that experimental counteroffensive as a success, then.
Now, Ciuc has entered the fray with their new, “limited edition” Winter Strong Beer with it’s 7% alcohol content. Once again, this beer seems squarely aimed at dethroning Tuborg products. In this case, we get a two-fer. Being based on a sour mash flavors, the beer joins Stejar in rebuffing the Tuborg Strong brand. But, in this case, it’s specifically a seasonal beer with noticeable winter spices in it, which competes favorably against Tuborg Christmas Brew.
Well poised for victory. Lemme put it this way, I tried and liked it very much. I find the combination of a winter ale with higher alcohol content to have quite pleasant during my first investigation. Not to mention, it’s got that famously delicious Miercurea Ciuc water as the primary ingredient to smooth out the taste considerably. I suspect Ciuc will probably earn a little brand loyalty from me for the remainder of the season.
And Tuborg, in general, seems to be in trouble. Watch out for what surely must be diminishing sales revenue reports. Torpedoes like these will sink just about anyone.
There’s a downside. As Ron pointed out, it’s essentially a crime against humanity to package good beer into plastic bottles which damage the flavors. So who would bottle their pride and joy into such a terrible environment? Romania.
You see, in Romania, shocking as it might seem to advanced civilizations, the stores here still charge customers an actual amount of money per bottle.
That’s right, you pay extra for the privilege of glass. The price of the bottle generally has nothing to do with its’ actual value, but instead is typically calculated according to the price of the beer it contains.
So, if you pick up a bottle of Noroc or Skol, you’ll pay something like 5 cents a bottle. If you get a sticla of, say, Tuborg Strong, then you can expect to pay something like 25 cents a bottle.
It might sound trivial considering you’ll get your deposit money back when you return the bottles. However, many people just do not want to part with the extra cash. It might be because their budget is tight. It might be the returning bottles is highly inconvenient.
It might be that they’re afraid of breaking the glass and losing the money. It might be the average buyer understands they’ll get some minuscule discount on the actual beer price for buying a 2-liter bottle quantities instead of half-liter glass.
However you slice it, plastic bottles are very popular in Romania. That probably won’t change until the highly profitable brewers stop charging money for glass bottles to the stores. Of course, it would be helpful if the country finally got a real recycling program in action.
And, yes, there would need to be more of that individual pride for one’s country sufficient enough to shame the many many glass bottle breakers from continuing to litter the streets and parks with dangerous shards leftover after a moment’s “fun.”
Plus, it appears that Ciuc Premium Winter Strong Beer is only sold in 1-liter plastic bottles, anyway. I’ll have to suffer with plastic residue affecting my otherwise yummily-different beer until the season is over. But not because Ciuc set up it’s winter headquarters in Poiana-Brasov to host Campionatul Distracţiei replete with snowbunnies. Nor because they have an online hockey game. Just because it’s good.
After the sales season, I’ll return my strong beer purchases to the Stejar brand. Except when I’m out, of course, because then I’ll be ordering the far more expensive Tuborg Strong in public. Y’know, don’t want the raven hotties to think I’m cheap or anything.



January 13th, 2007 at 9:44 pm
Please tell me you haven’t lowered yourself into consuming beer from a plastic two litre bottle….good to see something “different” hitting the stores there…But I’ll stick with Sam’s winter ale or …better yet…I’m goin to crack the top off a cherry wheat…the pics I promised are in your e-mail!
January 13th, 2007 at 10:53 pm
I’ll have to admit guilt on the charge, good sir. Unfortunately, available information indicates that Ciuc Premium Winter Strong Beer is only available in 1 liter plastic. Of course, I’ll keep a keen eye out for any other variations in the deployment.
As it is, the effect is satisfyingly dizzy… More to come. And thanks, Ron!
January 15th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
It’s not that inconvenient to retun the bottles. And in the absence of any other form of recycling, the bottle thing is refreshingly progressive to my mind.
And is it not the norm to charge people for glass bottles in most places? It’s a very effective way of ensuring they are returned. They even do it in the US I believe (hence the “Kramer and Newman driving to Michigan with a truck full of bottles” episode of Seinfeld)
But I agree on plastic bottles. I hate plastic bottles. And cans.
January 15th, 2007 at 5:15 pm
I buy canned beer because:
1/ I find the prospect of returning anything daunting
2/ I can’t tell the difference between a glass bottled and a canned beer (sic!)
3/ Cans don’t break
4/ Cans can be persuaded into occupying less volume in the trash can
You may conclude from the above that I’m a lazy bum and you’d probably be right.
Greetings and (late) thanks for the kind LoudHush review you’ve written a while back.
January 15th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
Andy – I think returning is a mild inconvenience. Obviously, I do it. Money is money. And I agree that without a recycling plan, it is better than nothing.
It is not common in the US to charge for glass. Seinfeld aside, glass bottles are taken for granted throughout the vast majority of America. This results in most of them being thrown out with the garbage, like in Houston. However, some cities, like Seattle, have an excellent (and somewhat “compulsory”) recycling program for glass, plastic, newspaper, and other paper… which makes it easy to recycle because trucks weekly pick up your goods at the same time as garbage.
I agree, plastic bottles and cans are subpar for those seeking quality taste.
cristi – Heh. Your reasons are quite practical. However, with a bit more time, you may come to realize there is a pleasant difference between draft beer, bottled beer, and the rest of the swill.
LoudHush worked quite nicely, I must say. I hope to use it in the future for Asterisk servers based in the US, but for now I am ‘confined’ to a US provider -for private reasons- who claims LoudHush is not compatible (despite my in-depth conversations with well-placed associates in management to the contrary). I’ll keep my eye on it and best of luck.
January 16th, 2007 at 9:21 am
oh…………..kay! Excuse my ignorance on euro beer…..but I understand that there is a running competition between Germany and Hungary on beer. Or is it Czeck Republic….no, I think not, but not sure. As for bottling, well, from this yank’s perspective even the renown soft drink Coca-cola tasted better in Costa Rica in a glass bottle than any can or plastic type container in the U.S. Thanks for the perspective.
January 16th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
I think the only competition for beer in Europe is between Germany and Germany. The produce arguably best of the cloned eurobeers. The Czechs just make a little marketing noise.
Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovakia, Montenegro, Greece, Finland, Luxembourg, Manx, and pretty much the rest of Europe make beers which are only different enough so as to be identifiable by the studied beer drink.
Think of it like fraternal twins, they look so much alike that the casual drifter cannot tell them apart. Of course, if you spend enough time with one, you’ll be able to find the tell-tale signs. I’d say European beers are largely some very close siblings without worlds of difference, in the vast overwhelming majority of cases.
Notable exceptions which first come to mind are Guinness, Boddingtons, hefeweizen, some wiess, most any Abbey ale from Belgium, every trappist from the Nederlands. Those are clearly remarkable beers* which put standard eurobeer clones to shame.
Unfortunately, these beers are typically known only to those who are “into” beer and seek out quality and variety. Even in Europe, Joe Sixpack ignorantly drinks his mass-marketed pig swill.
(* Of course, Romania can claim Dracula and Neumarkt as being distinctly different beers, which they are, but I believe purveyors of such liquids should be shot on sight for poisoning innocent victims.)
P.S. – $10 says the coke in Costa Rica tasted better not because of the glass bottle but because they used real sugar, instead of nasty corn syrup. In Romania, the Mountain Dew is noticeably different tasting because they use sugar here instead of high fructose corn guck… and the taste is better!
August 24th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
One question poped in my mind reading this …are u a jew by any chance?? …u’re so thing of the money aaall the time ;) ow and there is a diffrence betwen canned ursus and the bottled one I noticed recently (bottled testes better) nooow I’m thirsty ;)
August 24th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
..thinking..
August 24th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
I’m watching too much Seinfeld. Must stop. Now.
August 26th, 2007 at 5:02 am
I know you’re trying to be funny with a sarcastic stereo type, but no ;] I’m neither overly concerned with money nor am I jewish.